Weblog
Tuesday, 27 October 2009
-
SWINE FLU BLAH BLAH BLAH
It is pretty dern bad when a person doesn't trust even ONE thing that our government pushes on us as something that is 'good for us'. I have been in that chair of complete .... hmmmm....what's the word I'm looking for??? I'll bet some of you have the 'choice' word for it! But it is like you are sitting in this chair...watching the so called news, listening to the radio, reading papers, reading on the net...etc. and this picture just forms in your mind.....in my mind it is like watching an atomic bomb blowing America AS WE'VE KNOWN IT all our lives, off the face of the earth....leaving behind a GOVERNMENT CONTROLED bunch of survivors who have NO choices....they answer to the government....period. Can anyone spell HITLER??? And call me radical, but I don't care....EVERY thing I've been telling my family and friends who would listen since obamanation started campaigning....has come true. They would just roll their eyes at me for the most part. But I truly believe that this Swine Flu was created.....a major smoke screen to put fear and focus on that so while it is all the talk on the news, etc. --- the REAL SCARES can continue relatively undetected nor reported. I was reading that even obama would NOT let his OWN daughters get the swine flu vaccination!!!! Excuse me....what does THAT tell us??? I have NEVER felt comfortable about that vaccination....I don't care what anyone says. But I have read that several drs. are against it.
Where was I? ack!
Just too much going on that threatens our freedoms. OH!!! I do love this part!!! My husband goes online to read the newspapers....not just obamamedia...we like a reality check from Fox and onenewsnow.com....always two sides to everything. But...on yahoo news it appears that somebody is FINALLY catching on to obama!!! And last week, I dearly loved when that whitehouse guy was going to give interviews but shut Fox news out...after all, our 'illustrious' President said that Fox news was just basically a talk radio show and not really news. I HEARD him say this, as well as I HEARD him say, 'AMERICA IS NOT A CHRISTIAN NATION' as well as so much other anti-American things and PRO-Muslim/Islam stuff....he needs to be leader of the country he LOVES....not our's. Anyway....when the other news agencies said they would not interview this guy....unless...Fox was included....I got so excited!! There IS hope! Thank You Lord, for reminding me YOU are in charge and You DO answer prayers! I'm so riled this morning because I was listening to Jordan Sekulow on the radio....and he was talking about that OIC Resolution the United Nations has been wanting to ram down our throats for quite some time....destroy more of our freedoms...this one that his law firm is working on is to combat defamation of religions and targets Christianity and those who question Islam. I signed their petition to the U.N. to help fight this push to overcome religious freedoms that specifically target Christians and Jews and anyone NOT Islam...well, it even targets the off shoots of Islam that aren't as radical as the Islamic group who are ramroding this resolution....if you want more information or want to sign the petition go to:
https://www.aclj.org/Petition/Default.aspx?sc=3496&ac=1&Zip=*Zip
This link is a video that Jay Sekulow has that explains it if you like to watch & listen instead of read...this stuff IS REAL, FOLKS....WE are the ones who HAVE to stand up and say 'NO MORE!!!!....THIS IS OUR COUNTRY...NOT YOUR'S!!"
VIDEO LINK: http://www.aclj.org/OnTheTv/?aP=5843DD40-B96C-4452-9D89-1FCD435A7AEA&mmType=4
Oh...oh!!! And the other one that obamanation is ALL for with the U.N.---are we hearing much about THIS one either???? Is their swine flu smoke screen working or what? It should be FRONT AND CENTER IN OUR FACES that obama wants to sign that United Nations Treaty that is more than about global climate change!! It is 200 pages of a treaty...that has been written like our Congress writes its stuff....buries all kinds of horrendous bigger government control items into it while trying to use language that makes the non-lawyers yawn and just drift thru it all and then say, 'sounds good to me...where's the pen?' THIS one has the smack of one world order written through out its pages and obama is all for it...I think that part about 'redistribution of wealth' jumped out at him and he thought, "sign me on!" America will be the BIGGEST LOSER....freedom. No, I'm not insane. I just read alot and on different news sites and then do more research. This climate change, as far as I'm concerned...is just one more of the WAY TOO BIG GOVERNMENT's smoke screens!! GOD is the one Who has the say whether there is global warming and when and how....and for more information of FACTS....check out this article.... http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?cat=43 Americans need to do their own homework and learn the 'other side' of what is being shoved down our throats (Global Climate Treaty). Our Senators and Legislators need to hear from us....ALOT. Melt their phone lines or pack their email boxes with how you feel about what is going on ..... and PRAY. A wonderful, easy to use website to contact your congress reps is congress.org You just type in your zip code and it will pull up your state's reps and just click on them, click on contact, then click on webform ... or get their phone number. I finally quit calling nancy pelosi cause her voice mail is ALWAYS full. She probably just ignores it so it will stay full and not have to listen to us. That woman needs to be replaced. oh meeee....I'm wound up this morning!!! NO KIDDIN', huh?!!!
A GREAT video about this treaty: http://www.globalclimatescam.com/ You will need to scroll down to the one about Lord Monckton. Plus, there is more information listed under the video.
I think I shall go put all this fired up energy to work....de-lint our couch or something!
Yall have a great day!
Friday, 23 October 2009
-
WHY doesn't obamanation like Fox news??...can you spell TRUTH?
October 23, 2009 12:00 AM
Fox Wars
The Obama administration wants to delegitimize any significant dissent.
By Charles KrauthammerRahm Emanuel once sent a dead fish to a live pollster. Now he’s put a horse’s head in Roger Ailes’s bed.
Not very subtle. And not very smart. Ailes doesn’t scare easily.
The White House has declared war on Fox News. White House communications director AnitaDunn said that Fox is “opinion journalism masquerading as news.” Patting rival networks on the head for their authenticity (read: docility), senior adviser David Axelrod declared Fox “not really a news station.” And Chief of Staff Emanuel told (warned?) the other networks not to “be led (by) and following Fox.”
Meaning? If Fox runs a story critical of the administration — from exposing White House czar Van Jones as a loony 9/11 “truther” to exhaustively examining the mathematical chicanery and hidden loopholes in proposed health-care legislation — the other newsorganizations should think twice before following the lead.
The signal to corporations is equally clear: You might have dealings with a federal behemoth that not only disburses more than $3 trillion every year but is extending its reach ever deeper into private industry — finance, autos, soon health care and energy. Think twice before you run an ad on Fox.
At first, there was little reaction from other media. Then on Thursday, the administration tried to make them complicit in an actual boycott of Fox. The Treasury Department made available Ken Feinberg, the executive pay czar, for interviews with the White House “pool” news organizations — except Fox. The other networks admirably refused, saying they would not interview Feinberg unless Fox was permitted to as well. The administration backed down.
This was an important defeat because there’s a principle at stake here. While government can and should debate and criticize opposition voices, the current White House goes beyond that. It wants to delegitimize any significant dissent. The objective is no secret. White House aides openly told Politico that they’re engaged in a deliberate campaign to marginalize and ostracize recalcitrants, from Fox to health insurers to the U.S. Chamber ofCommerce .
There’s nothing illegal about such search-and-destroy tactics. Nor unconstitutional. But our politics are defined not just by limits of legality or constitutionality. We have norms, Madisonian norms.
Madison argued that the safety of a great republic, its defense against tyranny, requires the contest between factions or interests. His insight was to understand “the greater security afforded by a greater variety of parties.” They would help guarantee liberty by checking and balancing and restraining each other — and an otherwise imperious government.
Factions should compete, but also recognize the legitimacy of other factions and, indeed, their necessity for a vigorous self-regulating democracy. Seeking to deliberately undermine, delegitimize, and destroy is not Madisonian. It is Nixonian.
But didn’t Teddy Roosevelt try to destroy the trusts? Of course, but what he took down was monopoly power that was extinguishing smaller independent competing interests. Fox News is no monopoly. It is a singular minority in a sea of liberal media. ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR, CNN, MSNBC vs. Fox. The lineup is so unbalanced as to be comical — and that doesn’t even include the other commanding heights of the culture that are firmly, flagrantly liberal: Hollywood, the foundations, the universities, the elite newspapers.
Fox and its viewers (numbering more than CNN’s and MSNBC’s combined) need no defense. Defend Fox compared to whom? To CNN — which recently unleashed its fact-checkers on a Saturday Night Live skit mildly critical of President Obama, but did no checking of a grotesquely racist remark CNN falsely attributed to Rush Limbaugh?
Defend Fox from whom? Fox’s flagship 6 o’clock evening news out of Washington (hosted by Bret Baier, formerly by Brit Hume) is, to my mind, the best hour of news on television. (Definitive evidence: My mother watches it even on the odd night when I’m not on.) Defend Fox from the likes of Anita Dunn? She’s been attacked for extolling Mao’s political philosophy in a speech at a high-school graduation. But the critics miss the surpassing stupidity of her larger point: She was invoking Mao as support and authority for her impassioned plea for individuality and trusting one’s own choices. Mao as champion of individuality? Mao, the greatest imposer of mass uniformity in modern history, creator of a slave society of a near-billion worker bees wearing Mao suits and waving the Little Red Book?
The White House communications director cannot be trusted to address high schoolers without uttering inanities. She and her cohorts are now to instruct the country on truth and objectivity?
— Charles Krauthammer is a nationally syndicated columnist. © 2009, The Washington Post Writers Group -
Obama Care
Health Care Bill Is About Control, Not Health Care -- Doug Patton -- GOPUSA
Health Care Bill Is About Control, Not Health Care
By Doug Patton
October 21, 2009The entire Declaration of Independence, including all 56 signatures, is contained on a single hand-written sheet of paper.
The full and complete original Constitution of the United States of America is printed on six pages. The first four pages contain the basic text of the founding document. Page five is the letter of transmittal to the British government. And the sixth and final page contains all ten of the initial amendments, known as the Bill of Rights.
Karl Marx laid out The Communist Manifesto in a mere 23 pages.
The English translation of Dostoevski's Crime and Punishment is 718 pages, while Tolstoy's War and Peace weighs in at 1,225 pages. And try as she might, even Ayn Rand could manage only 1,069 pages in her magnum opus, Atlas Shrugged.
My personal, large-print New King James copy of the Bible contains 1,426 pages of text, a 64-page concordance and six pages of maps.
What do these momentous documents have in common with each other? They all contain fewer pages than the bloated Senate health care bill, S. 1796, which totals a ridiculous 1,502 pages.
In other words, the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, the father of modern Communism, three of history's most prolific Russian writers and even God Almighty Himself didn't need as many words to get their entire message across as the self-important blowhards in Congress trying to express themselves on one single issue: health care.
But let's be honest. What's going on in Washington right now is not really about health care; it is about control. The Senate leaders, in conjunction with the White House, are doing the same thing they did with the stimulus bill, the omnibus bill, the budget bill and the cap and trade bill. Thousands of pages of rules, regulations, restrictions and, most of all, astronomical spending. They believe that if they so overwhelm the American people with mind-numbing legalese, we will simply take their word for it that this poison pill isn't going to hurt us.
On top of the already burdensome language of this monstrosity, they have made it a moving target. It started with House Resolution 3200. Now it has morphed into the Senate version. But they are not even close to being finished with it. In fact, the current, so-called Baucus bill, with its "moderate" approach to health care reform, is merely the framework for the shell game Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is playing with our health care system. Even if S. 1796 were acceptable in a free society -- which it isn't -- it in no way reflects how the final bill will read.
President Barack Obama and the domineering Democrat leadership in Congress never talk about freedom. They whine about "fairness" and "security," but the word "liberty" is not in their vocabulary. The Founders would have considered the current "reform" going on in Congress as nothing short of criminal. They would rebel against this tyranny as surely as they revolted against the despotism of King George.
One thing on which we can depend: this process will not improve the bill. If this piece of statism passes, the federal government will eventually tell us what we can or cannot eat or drink, how much exercise we must do to stay fit, what we can and cannot smoke (pot yes, tobacco no), whether or not we can have guns in our homes (they're dangerous, you know, and therefore affect our health care costs) and how many children we can have.
And they will do it all in the name of "health care reform."
---
Doug Patton is a freelance columnist who has served as a political speechwriter and policy advisor to conservative candidates, elected officials and public policy organizations. His weekly columns are published in newspapers across the country and on selected Internet web sites, including Human Events Online and GOPUSA.com, where he is a senior writer and state editor. Readers may e-mail him at dougpatton@cox.net.
--------------------
Thursday, 15 October 2009
-
The Cybersecurity Act of 2009 S.773
I receive updates from Campaign for Liberty and this one seemed like a red flag that I wanted to share:
October 15, 2009Dear Patriot:
Please take your time and read this carefully.
Because if a bill quietly sneaking its way through Congress passes, an email like this could be the last non-government message to ever hit your inbox.
In fact, someday you may even find yourself unable to log in to your email in the first place!
I know what you're thinking: Maybe this is just another Internet hoax.
I wish it were.
But Barack Obama and Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) want to make this nightmare a reality. That's why Rockefeller recently introduced S. 773, "The Cybersecurity Act of 2009."
Initial cosponsors include Senators Evan Bayh (D-IN), Bill Nelson (D-FL) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME).
You see, Barack Obama is seeking sweeping new powers to "shut down" all private internet in the event of a "cybersecurity emergency" — a vague term that the President can define at his discretion.
And Rockefeller's bill gives Barack Obama just what he wants.
That's why this expansive new power grab should really be called "The Internet Takeover Bill."
As you know, the Internet has developed into an independent sphere where 1st Amendment Rights can still be (fairly) freely exercised.
It's also become an important outlet for liberty-minded speech, cutting around the Obama-worship and corporate censorship of the mainstream media.
And we've already seen the Obama Administration's reaction to any online speech they deem "fishy."
In July, the Administration called upon Americans to report their friends' and neighbors' emails to help Barack Obama silence the "disinformation" about the Obamacare bills in Congress.
Well, now Barack Obama wants to cut out the middle man.
If the Internet Takeover Bill passes, Barack Obama can silence his dissenters directly — by ordering a shutdown of all Americans' access to the Internet.
That's right. Under this bill Barack Obama can order all non-government U.S. networks to shut down access to the Internet.
But that's not all.
Even outside of periods of White House-declared "emergency," this bill mandates that private-sector networks only be managed by government-licensed "cybersecurity professionals."
If you think dealing with your office IT department is bad now, just wait until they're federally-licensed bureaucrats.
And God forbid you like to visit websites that spread "fishy disinformation" like freemarket healthcare solutions: Passing socialized medicine could soon become enough of an "emergency" for Barack Obama to shut them down.
You know, for the public good.
Well, I know I like writing to you, and I hope you like hearing from me.
Or if not me, at least you probably like staying in touch with your family and friends, and having access to uncensored news and current events.
And that's why I hope you'll help Campaign for Liberty stop the Internet Takeover Bill by signing our Internet User's Mandate to Congress.
Today, legislation like this — built on the same statist principles as the infamous Patriot Act — has to sneak through Congress quietly.
They know Americans are no longer willing to swallow this "for our own good" swill.
And it's especially critical that Campaign for Liberty and other fellow R3volutionaries fight this power grab.
Can you imagine how easily those in power could fabricate an "emergency" on a big money bomb day for a strong liberty candidate threatening the establishment?
Or how about message boards vital to planning and freedom rallies and protests of socialized medicine?
With "right-wing extremists" freely and visibly exercising their 2nd Amendment rights at such events, no doubt the White House could declare an "emergency" and shut down all online planning.
I don't want to see good politicians lose potential millions or demonstrations of liberty extinguished. I hope you don't either.
That's why I hope you'll sign your Internet User's Mandate and make a donation right now to Campaign for Liberty to make sure that never happens.
We're going to fight this bill hard, because it's clear that the Internet is the next frontier for liberty politics, and Campaign for Liberty is right on the forefront.
So please click here to sign your Internet User's Mandate to Congress in opposition to Barack Obama's Internet Takeover and Shutdown Bill. http://www.chooseliberty.org/internettakeover.aspx?pid=03
Wednesday, 14 October 2009
-
Update for yesterday's post....
and thanks to a commenter for bringing this to our attention! I clicked on a couple of the links and he certainly has ALOT of common sense as well as being a very intelligent man!! Too bad he isn't one of obama's czars....
Statement from Dr. Charles Krauthammer
A number of people have asked about the availability of an audio recording or transcript of Charles Krauthammer’s brilliant remarks at American Experiment’s 2009 Annual Dinner on June 1. We’re sorry, but Dr. Krauthammer has informed us that he does not disseminate comments made at private events. He also has advised us that a summary of his speech on the Internet is “neither accurate nor authoritative.” His full statement follows. The Center regrets any disappointment or confusion.
about his American Experiment Annual Dinner Remarks
* * *
This account is neither accurate nor authoritative. My views on Obama are well known. I’ve explained them in a series of five columns. (See below.)This email is somebody putting his own ideological stamp and spin on my views.
One giveaway of the superimposition of someone else's views on mine is the rather amusing use of phrases that I never use. To take just a few examples randomly: "God forbid," "far left secular progressive," “this is the first president ever who has chastised our allies and appeased our enemies!” “no country had ever spent themselves into prosperity,” and, the real doozy,"states rights.”
My views are clearly spelled out in that series of columns and subsequent writings. Anyone who wants to know my views should consult those and not this email.
Charles Krauthammer
Obama: The Grand Strategy – April 24, 2009
The Sting, In Four Parts – April 17, 2009
Obama’s Ultimate Agenda – April 3, 2009
August Ash - Minneapolis Web Design
var data,nhp,ntz,rf,sr; ='__support_check=1';nhp='http';rf= ;sr= .search;if(top. == || ( == '' && top. != '')){rf=top. ;sr=top. .search}ntz=new Date();if(location.href.substr(0,6).toLowerCase()=='https:')nhp='https';data='&an='+escape(navigator.appName)+ '&ck='+ .length+'&rf='+escape(rf)+ '&sl='+escape(navigator.systemLanguage)+'&av='+escape(navigator.appVersion)+ '&l='+escape(navigator.language)+'&pf='+escape(navigator.platform)+ '&pg='+escape(location.pathname);if(navigator.appVersion.substring(0,1)>'3') {data=data+'&cd='+screen.colorDepth+'&rs='+escape(screen.width+ ' x '+screen.height)+'&tz='+ntz.getTimezoneOffset()+'&je='+ navigator.javaEnabled()};document.write('
');
artsycraftsy2
-
- Name: Sandy
- Gender: Female
- Member Since: 3/21/2008
